CLEARING HOUSE is structured along seven organised sections and three major perspectives. The first and second perspectives are operationalising and implementing an inter- and trans-disciplinary research approach. The third perspective focuses on knowledge exchange and dissemination.
Reviewing knowledge & developing the analytical concept:
- D1.1 Report on a novel standardised Sino-European UFBS typology
- D1.2 Review report on UFBS for European and Chinese resilient cities
- D1.3 Report on societal perceptions and demands towards UFBS in China and Europe
- D1.4 Report on governance, institutional and economic frameworks
of UFBS in China and Europe
Conducting the comparative case study analysis:
- D2.1 Report on the exploratory analysis of all the case studies
- D2.2 Synthesis report summarising the comparative analysis of UFBS implementation
Establishing the collaborative learning process:
- D3.2 Local co-design workshops synthesis report
- D3.3 Sino-European co-design report
- D3.4 Mid-term report on learning mechanisms under the 1st call
- D3.5 Final report on learning mechanism activities
- D3.6 Report on the citizen science approach in the case studies
- D3.7 Learning process evaluation report, including options for durable institutionalisation
Synthesising knowledge, developing tools and piloting solutions:
- D4.1 Report on business models and investment cases for UFBS
- D4.5 Report from testing and piloting the tools in field laboratories
Communicating and disseminating:
- D5.3 Educational package on UFBS
Project management:
- D6.5 Final report to the EC
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok