Reports

CLEARING HOUSE is structured along seven organised sections and three major perspectives. The first and second perspectives are operationalising and implementing an inter- and trans-disciplinary research approach. The third perspective focuses on knowledge exchange and dissemination.

Reviewing knowledge & developing the analytical concept:

• D1.1 Report on a novel standardised Sino-European UFBS typology
• D1.2 Review report on UFBS for European and Chinese resilient cities
• D1.3 Report on societal perceptions and demands towards UFBS in China and Europe
• D1.4 Report on governance, institutional and economic frameworks
  of UFBS in China and Europe

Conducting the comparative case study analysis:

• D2.1 Report on the exploratory analysis of all the case studies
• D2.2 Synthesis report summarising the comparative analysis of UFBS implementation

Establishing the collaborative learning process:

• D3.2 Local co-design workshops synthesis report
• D3.3 Sino-European co-design report
• D3.4 Mid-term report on learning mechanisms under the 1st call
• D3.5 Final report on learning mechanism activities
• D3.6 Report on the citizen science approach in the case studies
• D3.7 Learning process evaluation report, including options for durable institutionalisation

Synthesising knowledge, developing tools and piloting solutions:

• D4.1 Report on business models and investment cases for UFBS
• D4.5 Report from testing and piloting the tools in field laboratories

Communicating and disseminating:

• D5.3 Educational package on UFBS

Project management:

• D6.5 Final report to the EC