Our Reports
CLEARING HOUSE is structured along seven organised sections and three major perspectives. The first and second perspectives are operationalising and implementing an inter- and trans-disciplinary research approach. The third perspective focuses on knowledge exchange and dissemination.
1
Reviewing knowledge & developing the analytical concept:
- D1.1 Report on a novel standardised Sino-European UF-NBS typology
- D1.2 Review report on UF-NBS for European and Chinese resilient cities
- D1.3 Report on societal perceptions and demands towards UF-NBS in China and Europe
- D1.4 Report on governance, institutional and economic frameworks of UF-NBS in China and Europe
- D1.5 Screening tool for the exploratory case study analysis
- D1.6 Interdisciplinary analytical framework
2
Conducting the comparative case study analysis:
- D2.1 Report on the exploratory analysis of all the case studies
- D2.2 Synthesis report summarising the comparative analysis of UF-NBS implementation
3
Establishing the collaborative learning process:
- D3.1 Guidance document for the local co-design and co-learning workshops (including local stakeholder analysis)
- D3.2 Local co-design workshops synthesis report
- D3.3 Sino-European co-design report
- D3.4 Mid-term report on learning mechanisms under the 1st call
- D3.5 Final report on learning mechanism activities
- D3.6 Report on the citizen science approach in the case studies
- D3.7 Learning process evaluation report, including options for durable institutionalisation
4
Synthesising knowledge, developing tools and piloting solutions:
- D4.1 Report on business models and investment cases for UF-NBS
- D4.2 Online application for developing, modelling and assessing UF-NBS scenarios
- D4.3 Online benchmarking tool
- D4.4 Four thematic guidelines
- D4.5 Report from testing and piloting the tools in field laboratories
5
Communicating and disseminating:
6
Project management:
- D6.5 Final report to the EC